Skip to main content

mental ray license bug is fixed on an Intel Core i7 machine

There was a critical license related bug in mental ray 3.7 on Intel Core i7 and the fixed version seems to be distributed now.

http://forum.mentalimages.com/showthread.php?t=5511

The fixed mental ray (SPM) version (might depends on OEM) is the following.

mental ray 3.7: 3.7.1.31 (2009 September 16) or higher
mental ray 3.7+: 3.7.53.6 (2009 October 22) or higher

The detail of this problem is: When you want to run mental ray on Intel Core i7 machine, you will get the following error message:

Sorry, no license available

and can not run mental ray even you have enough licenses left.

It seems recent Intel's CPU becomes complex to count the number of cores. This bug seems related with this.

http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-64-architecture-processor-topology-enumeration/

Personally, I don't like the license that limits the number of cores. Because the new machines has more cores, but we can not use these cores because of license shortage. If I buy a new machine, I expect that the software runs faster or more comfortable to use. On the other hand, there is no such limitation for GPU that has a lot of cores inside. NVidia/mental image's new renderer 'iray' seems no such limitation for number of cores. I don't know why CPU and GPU have different licensing method. It is just a historical reason, or they are promoting GPU. But, then, Intel or AMD might sue such a license. Fro the users, it is not so great to be suffered by such a strange licensing form.

I believe if you have a problem with mental ray on an Intel Core i7 machine, you could get the updated version when you asked to the support. But, if the support doesn't know this problem, I recommend to refer the above mental images official forum's link and request the fixed version of mental ray.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The architecture of mental ray

Figure 1 shows the standard mental ray architecture. Figure 1 standard mental ray architecture. F1: Application scene file: Application proper file. For example, .max (3dsmax), .ma or .mb (Maya), .scn (XSI). F2: .mi file: mental ray scene description file. If the DCC software has mental ray plugin, or integrates mental ray, they usually support .mi file export. (A2) 1. Application: DCC (Digital contents creation) software. For example, Maya, 3DSMax, XSI, CAD program, and so on. 2. mental ray core: mental ray core program. There are library version mental ray and stand alone mental ray. The library version mental ray is usually invoked by a DCC application via translator module of the application. A translator is a module of a DCC application which translate the DCC application's internal data structure to the mental ray data structure. The stand alone version mental ray reads a .mi file and performs the rendering. If you have only mental ray core, mental ray does not work. mental...

iray 5: iray in standalone mental ray

So far, I told about exporting an mi file. Now here is the shader conversion for iray. iray supports mia_material. To reuse current scenes, it is nice if I could convert the 3dsmax shaders to mia_material (Arch&Design) shader. I could imagine that some of other shaders will be supported also, but, iray is a CUDA program. CUDA has a divergence problem, it means, if many kind of shaders are in the scene, the performance becomes low. That's natural. A shader is a function and many different shaders are running on a CUDA device, I could see it will be slow. But, if the same function everywhere, then CUDA works well. (in theory. If function itself has a lot of branches, then there is a problem. Though many obstacles are there, but many kind of shaders seems to have not so chance. ) Also I imagine there is less trouble if I use the mental images native supported shaders since iray is a new renderer. In my personal opinion, I would convert the shaders. You can find 3dsmax shaders ...

A note of mental ray/iray camera terminology.

The original mental ray camera is a pinhole camera. Therefore, some of the terminology differs with a normal camera. I will write them down here. aperture: This is the film width size. This has no relationship with lens aperture/opening. mental ray's camera was a pinhole camera, there is no lens aperture. focal: This is the distance from lens to the film (sensor). Pinhole camera always focused, so there is no focal length meaning. But using parameters aperture and focal length, we can compute the horizontal field of view. I think these two parameters exist for this purpose. aspect ratio: This is film(sensor)'s aspect ratio. There is no relationship with pixel resolution and camera geometry.  aspect ratio = film width/film height. Note: If we use aperture, focal, and aspect ratio, we can compute the vertical field of view. mental ray/iray camera model (pinhole camera) without lens shader Current mental ray/iray can have depth of field effect, etc., this termino...